Difference between revisions of "Forum:Who wants to choose featured articles?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(who wants to choose featured articles?) |
(#twoweapon looks good to me) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
If nobody answers by April 29, I'm going to go ahead and feature [[monster frequency]] and #[[twoweapon]]. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 16:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC) | If nobody answers by April 29, I'm going to go ahead and feature [[monster frequency]] and #[[twoweapon]]. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 16:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : #[[twoweapon]] looks good to me. I do think [[monster frequency]] really ought to have a (preferably sortable) table of monster frequencies (or at least a link to one) before I'd call it feature quality. --[[User:Ilmari Karonen|Ilmari Karonen]] 16:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:22, 25 April 2011
Who wants to choose featured articles? Currently, nobody does - and last year's features keep reappearing. Everybody, you're welcome to just do it, suggest something, or comment below.
If nobody answers by April 29, I'm going to go ahead and feature monster frequency and #twoweapon. --Tjr 16:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- #twoweapon looks good to me. I do think monster frequency really ought to have a (preferably sortable) table of monster frequencies (or at least a link to one) before I'd call it feature quality. --Ilmari Karonen 16:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
