Difference between revisions of "Source talk:NetHack 1.4f/invent.c"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ray Chason (talk | contribs) (Harlow seems to have goofed. Alas, so have I.) |
Ray Chason (talk | contribs) (Uploaded the 1.4f invent.c) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
A recipe for getting a correct 1.4f from the UUNet sources almost warrants its own article. I seem not to have a good procedure myself -- I just diffed my attempt against the Harlow distribution and found manifest errors in both directions, and not just in invent.c. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 04:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | A recipe for getting a correct 1.4f from the UUNet sources almost warrants its own article. I seem not to have a good procedure myself -- I just diffed my attempt against the Harlow distribution and found manifest errors in both directions, and not just in invent.c. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 04:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Uploaded the 1.4f invent.c as derived from the UUNet sources. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 17:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 2 September 2006
Notice that "1.3" at the top of the file. The patch at UUNet clearly shows that invent.c does indeed have changes from 1.3d. Unfortunately, the patch seems to have been generated using something other than the distributed 1.3d invent.c, and ed chokes when you try to apply it. The overall patch generates a lot of output on stdout and Mr. Harlow seems to have overlooked the error messages.
A recipe for getting a correct 1.4f from the UUNet sources almost warrants its own article. I seem not to have a good procedure myself -- I just diffed my attempt against the Harlow distribution and found manifest errors in both directions, and not just in invent.c. -- Ray Chason 04:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded the 1.4f invent.c as derived from the UUNet sources. -- Ray Chason 17:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
