Difference between revisions of "Source talk:NetHack 1.4f/mon.c"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Why not fix _obvious_ corruptions?)
 
(Well, OK...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Why not just fix ''obvious'' corruptions, such as the one on line 264, rather than comment them? --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 11:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 
Why not just fix ''obvious'' corruptions, such as the one on line 264, rather than comment them? --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 11:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 +
:Well, OK...though this and the non-patching of invent.c seem to be the only ones.  I otherwise get the same results when using the UUNet distribution. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 16:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:03, 2 September 2006

Why not just fix obvious corruptions, such as the one on line 264, rather than comment them? --ZeroOne 11:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, OK...though this and the non-patching of invent.c seem to be the only ones. I otherwise get the same results when using the UUNet distribution. -- Ray Chason 16:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)