Difference between revisions of "Source talk:True rumors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(signing my comment - had forgotten to log in) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:"Zap yourself and see what happens" - at a guess, this comes from pre-Guidebook days when it wasn't obvious that you ''could'' zap yourself. | :"Zap yourself and see what happens" - at a guess, this comes from pre-Guidebook days when it wasn't obvious that you ''could'' zap yourself. | ||
| − | :Similarly, "A wand of cancellation is like a wand of polymorph" probably just means that they can both be used on objects as well as monsters. [[User: | + | :Similarly, "A wand of cancellation is like a wand of polymorph" probably just means that they can both be used on objects as well as monsters. [[User:Robin Johnson|Robin Johnson]] 21:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:59, 26 September 2006
Are we ordering this within the categories based on rumor number or resistance type? I think we should stick with rumor number. Lotte 01:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- IMHO, people who are looking for a specific rumour will use the search facility and won't care about the order, while people who are just browsing would prefer the more logical order. Having said that, I am not an admin here, just a veteran Nethacker. Ekaterin 10:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Some rumours are tough to explain. I have been using three question marks (???) as an indication that I'm not happy with the explanation of a rumour. I suggest that people not delete them unless they also replace the explanation with something more convincing. Ekaterin 19:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- "Zap yourself and see what happens" - at a guess, this comes from pre-Guidebook days when it wasn't obvious that you could zap yourself.
- Similarly, "A wand of cancellation is like a wand of polymorph" probably just means that they can both be used on objects as well as monsters. Robin Johnson 21:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
