Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aggravate monster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Permanent or not?: new section) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Permanent or not? == | == Permanent or not? == | ||
− | If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent? | + | If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent? {{unsigned|DemonSlayerThe3rd}} |
+ | :No. That effect is equivalent to the monster spell (on the bottom of the article), it does not give you the intrinsic. -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] 16:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:03, 7 September 2010
Is it really true a gremlin will steal aggravate monster? I thougth they would only remove a subset of intrinsics. Tjr 16:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. "You feel less attractive." See sit.c, line 442 [Answer provided by RJaguar3; copied here by me --Marcmagus 21:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)]
positive effects
Will this wake up sleeping pets? Source quotes say yes, wizmode test say no. [related issue]-Tjr 23:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Permanent or not?
If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DemonSlayerThe3rd (talk • contribs)
- No. That effect is equivalent to the monster spell (on the bottom of the article), it does not give you the intrinsic. -- Qazmlpok 16:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC)