Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alignment record"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Alignment gains/losses from killing: Clarify)
(Alignment gains/losses from killing: Table is correct, not the example)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
It is stated that a neutral, potentially-peaceful monster (a gnome or air elemental, for instance) causes no alignment change. Is this true if you are neutral? That contradicts the table above regarding co-aligned monsters (note the "max(3, malign)"). I'll check the source unless someone else does it first. -[[User:Actual-nh|Actual-nh]] ([[User talk:Actual-nh|talk]]) 23:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 
It is stated that a neutral, potentially-peaceful monster (a gnome or air elemental, for instance) causes no alignment change. Is this true if you are neutral? That contradicts the table above regarding co-aligned monsters (note the "max(3, malign)"). I'll check the source unless someone else does it first. -[[User:Actual-nh|Actual-nh]] ([[User talk:Actual-nh|talk]]) 23:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 +
: The table is correct. -[[User:Actual-nh|Actual-nh]] ([[User talk:Actual-nh|talk]]) 02:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:40, 19 May 2021

Alignment gains/losses from killing

It is stated that a neutral, potentially-peaceful monster (a gnome or air elemental, for instance) causes no alignment change. Is this true if you are neutral? That contradicts the table above regarding co-aligned monsters (note the "max(3, malign)"). I'll check the source unless someone else does it first. -Actual-nh (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

The table is correct. -Actual-nh (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)