Difference between revisions of "Talk:Enlightenment"
m (moved User talk:Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment to Talk:Enlightenment) |
(history merge completed.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment | the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read. | I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment | the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read. | ||
[[User:Thomag|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Thomag|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Move completed== | ||
| + | I have finished history merging the article from Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment and reverted to the last version before the merge template was added. However, I somehow mangled up the talk page, and the main namespace's talk page does not show up in the history. -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 18:39, January 11, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:39, 11 January 2010
This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at Property. Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly? -- Marcmagus 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Change to resistances presentation
I folded all the resistances in the enlightenment table into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read. Thomag 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Move completed
I have finished history merging the article from Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment and reverted to the last version before the merge template was added. However, I somehow mangled up the talk page, and the main namespace's talk page does not show up in the history. -Tjr 18:39, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
