Talk:Enlightenment

This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at Property. Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly? -- Marcmagus 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Change to resistances presentation

I folded all the resistances in the enlightenment table into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read. Thomag 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Move completed

I have finished history merging the article from Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment and reverted to the last version before the merge template was added. However, I somehow mangled up the talk page, and the main namespace's talk page does not show up in the history. -Tjr 18:39, January 11, 2010 (UTC)