Difference between revisions of "Talk:Foo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is too serious. [[Special:Contributions/192.91.171.42|192.91.171.42]] 18:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | This page is too serious. [[Special:Contributions/192.91.171.42|192.91.171.42]] 18:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | I believe some etymology is in order. Why "foo?" Why not "X" or "?" or "blah" or "charles"? | + | I believe some etymology is in order. Why "foo?" Why not "X" or "?" or "blah" or "charles"? {{unsigned|76.4.66.233}} |
| + | :[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metasyntactic_variable#Words_commonly_used_as_metasyntactic_variables], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foobar], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUBAR]. I supposed the wikipedia link to Foobar could be added, but to actually 'answer' your question: "Why does this page use 'X' and not 'foo'?". -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] 02:29, June 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:29, 6 June 2010
This page is too serious. 192.91.171.42 18:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe some etymology is in order. Why "foo?" Why not "X" or "?" or "blah" or "charles"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.4.66.233 (talk • contribs)
