Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fun"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Fabulous idea, good content. Personally I'm not sure of the style.) |
(No huge outcry, so added todo.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :No huge outcry, so added todo. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 20:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 20 July 2008
Fabulous idea, good content. Personally I'm not sure of the style.
I was going to add the below as a todo, but given Ray's comment (nice article), I suppose this might just be my opinion so I'm putting it here for discussion. I do certainly agree having an article called Fun is an excellent idea, and the content is good. My issue is whether the style is appropriate:
- Proposed todo
- Style - wikihack is not an encyclopaedia. Nevertheless, according to the Style guide, articles in the main namespace should be written in a largely encyclopaedic tone. While this should undoubtedly be applied with latitude on a page entitled Fun, an overly chatty style and particularly use of the first person should be avoided. This article should be rewritten to follow the style guide.
--Rogerb-on-NAO 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- No huge outcry, so added todo. --Rogerb-on-NAO 20:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
