Talk:Fun

From NetHackWiki
Revision as of 20:04, 10 July 2008 by Rogerb-on-NAO (talk | contribs) (Fabulous idea, good content. Personally I'm not sure of the style.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fabulous idea, good content. Personally I'm not sure of the style.

I was going to add the below as a todo, but given Ray's comment (nice article), I suppose this might just be my opinion so I'm putting it here for discussion. I do certainly agree having an article called Fun is an excellent idea, and the content is good. My issue is whether the style is appropriate:

Proposed todo
Style - wikihack is not an encyclopaedia. Nevertheless, according to the Style guide, articles in the main namespace should be written in a largely encyclopaedic tone. While this should undoubtedly be applied with latitude on a page entitled Fun, an overly chatty style and particularly use of the first person should be avoided. This article should be rewritten to follow the style guide.

--Rogerb-on-NAO 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)