Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hack 1.0 source code"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Note former bugs in Google Groups re whitespace)
 
(Preceding comment only applies to Hack)
Line 1: Line 1:
Some of the source files in the Harlow distributions at least of Hack have minor indentation glitches.  This seems to be due to bugs in the Google Groups software.  These bugs have since been fixed.
+
Some of the source files in the Harlow distributions <s>at least</s> of Hack have minor indentation glitches.  This seems to be due to bugs in the Google Groups software.  These bugs have since been fixed.
  
 
For example, in hack.apply.c lines 83-89, the Harlow distribution gives
 
For example, in hack.apply.c lines 83-89, the Harlow distribution gives
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
It seems clear enough which one this file is supposed to look like.  Of course it compiles the same as before. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 04:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 
It seems clear enough which one this file is supposed to look like.  Of course it compiles the same as before. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 04:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Strike "at least" in the above comment; Harlow's NetHack 1.3d squares with the UUNet archive. -- [[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 06:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:10, 2 September 2006

Some of the source files in the Harlow distributions at least of Hack have minor indentation glitches. This seems to be due to bugs in the Google Groups software. These bugs have since been fixed.

For example, in hack.apply.c lines 83-89, the Harlow distribution gives

			pline("Your weapon is welded to your hand!");
			return(0);
		}
 setuwep((struct obj *) 0);
	}
	current_ice_box->owt += obj->owt;
	freeinv(obj);

where a fresh download from Google Groups gives

			pline("Your weapon is welded to your hand!");
			return(0);
		}
		setuwep((struct obj *) 0);
	}
	current_ice_box->owt += obj->owt;
	freeinv(obj);

It seems clear enough which one this file is supposed to look like. Of course it compiles the same as before. -- Ray Chason 04:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Strike "at least" in the above comment; Harlow's NetHack 1.3d squares with the UUNet archive. -- Ray Chason 06:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)