Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lich"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Huh?: Buuurrrrp!)
(How not to kill a lich: new section)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
How can both be true?{{unsigned|76.181.14.252}}
 
How can both be true?{{unsigned|76.181.14.252}}
 
:You don't have to kill something to eat it, if you're, say, a [[purple worm]].--[[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 18:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 
:You don't have to kill something to eat it, if you're, say, a [[purple worm]].--[[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 18:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== How not to kill a lich ==
 +
 +
Don't wield a 'trice corpse if you don't have magic resistance. A gnome on level 8 of the Gnomish Mines deliberately jumped on to a polymorph trap, turned into a lich and destroyed my gloves. Not nice...

Revision as of 13:59, 30 June 2008

I think all Liches could be on a same page, as they share most of their properties with themselves. I'd love to read about tactics against liches as well. Progo 10:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Huh?

A lich:

   * does not breathe.
   * has a head, a couple of arms, and a torso.
   * can regenerate hit points.
   * is poisonous to eat.
   * is undead.
   * always starts as hostile.
   * can pick up magical items.
   * has infravision.
   * never leaves a corpse. 

How can both be true?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.14.252 (talkcontribs)

You don't have to kill something to eat it, if you're, say, a purple worm.--Ray Chason 18:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

How not to kill a lich

Don't wield a 'trice corpse if you don't have magic resistance. A gnome on level 8 of the Gnomish Mines deliberately jumped on to a polymorph trap, turned into a lich and destroyed my gloves. Not nice...