Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monsters with need +x weapon to hit (SLASH'EM)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Wasn't logged in...) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Good lord, Vlad needs +3 to hit?! How is an illiterate player expected to get the Candelabrum? --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] 02:20, January 23, 2010 (UTC) | Good lord, Vlad needs +3 to hit?! How is an illiterate player expected to get the Candelabrum? --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] 02:20, January 23, 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | :A pet dragon or Vorpal Jabberwock can hit for +3. I imagine that getting such a pet while illiterate (no spell or scroll) would be a pain though, doubly so with Vlad's leveldrain. -- [[ | + | :A pet dragon or Vorpal Jabberwock can hit for +3. I imagine that getting such a pet while illiterate (no spell or scroll) would be a pain though, doubly so with Vlad's leveldrain. -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] 04:31, January 23, 2010 (UTC) |
− | On the subject of renaming the articles, I think a better title would be something like the lines of "Monsters with enchantment resistance" (which is misleading, but I think on the right track). "Need +x weapon to hit" just sounds really awkward to me. -- [[ | + | On the subject of renaming the articles, I think a better title would be something like the lines of "Monsters with enchantment resistance" (which is misleading, but I think on the right track). "Need +x weapon to hit" just sounds really awkward to me. -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] 04:31, January 23, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:31, 23 January 2010
Same notes about slashem specific: article title + article should say so –Tjr 14:45, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
Good lord, Vlad needs +3 to hit?! How is an illiterate player expected to get the Candelabrum? --Darth l33t 02:20, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
- A pet dragon or Vorpal Jabberwock can hit for +3. I imagine that getting such a pet while illiterate (no spell or scroll) would be a pain though, doubly so with Vlad's leveldrain. -- Qazmlpok 04:31, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
On the subject of renaming the articles, I think a better title would be something like the lines of "Monsters with enchantment resistance" (which is misleading, but I think on the right track). "Need +x weapon to hit" just sounds really awkward to me. -- Qazmlpok 04:31, January 23, 2010 (UTC)