Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mummy wrapping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've always wondered that...Why the mummy wrapping? Surely any armor would give the same effect logically. Silly shopkeepers. They don't mind a dwarf looting all their stuff and hacking at all their walls, but invisibility is RIGHT OUT, even with pounds of armor on... [[User:Lotte|Lotte]] 03:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | I've always wondered that...Why the mummy wrapping? Surely any armor would give the same effect logically. Silly shopkeepers. They don't mind a dwarf looting all their stuff and hacking at all their walls, but invisibility is RIGHT OUT, even with pounds of armor on... [[User:Lotte|Lotte]] 03:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
: If you had read the article, you would have seen that it is a reference to the invisible man. | : If you had read the article, you would have seen that it is a reference to the invisible man. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But all of the invisible man's clothing was seen, not only his bandages. ;) | ||
Revision as of 21:22, 7 March 2009
I've always wondered that...Why the mummy wrapping? Surely any armor would give the same effect logically. Silly shopkeepers. They don't mind a dwarf looting all their stuff and hacking at all their walls, but invisibility is RIGHT OUT, even with pounds of armor on... Lotte 03:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you had read the article, you would have seen that it is a reference to the invisible man.
But all of the invisible man's clothing was seen, not only his bandages. ;)
