Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spellcasting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Blackcustard (talk | contribs) (I think the other table is better actually.) |
(→Penalty table) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Penalty table== | ==Penalty table== | ||
:I completely agree with Derekt75, no need for two copies of the same table. But I think the OTHER table, the one that was deleted, is better than the one we kept. Maybe we should swap them around or combine their designs to make an even better super table? [[User:Blackcustard|Blackcustard]] 22:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | :I completely agree with Derekt75, no need for two copies of the same table. But I think the OTHER table, the one that was deleted, is better than the one we kept. Maybe we should swap them around or combine their designs to make an even better super table? [[User:Blackcustard|Blackcustard]] 22:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Here are the differences that I remember: | ||
| + | ::* different order of columns | ||
| + | ::* different placement in article | ||
| + | ::* deleted table had a last column that contained a "-4" for every special spell | ||
| + | ::I figured that the column order didn't matter, and that the -4 was indicated in the text immediately preceding the table, so I chose the table that had the newer placement. Were there other differences that I missed? Is the "-4" useful? Was the previous column order useful? [[User:Derekt75|Derekt75]] 23:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:49, 6 March 2012
Penalty table
- I completely agree with Derekt75, no need for two copies of the same table. But I think the OTHER table, the one that was deleted, is better than the one we kept. Maybe we should swap them around or combine their designs to make an even better super table? Blackcustard 22:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Here are the differences that I remember:
- different order of columns
- different placement in article
- deleted table had a last column that contained a "-4" for every special spell
- I figured that the column order didn't matter, and that the -4 was indicated in the text immediately preceding the table, so I chose the table that had the newer placement. Were there other differences that I missed? Is the "-4" useful? Was the previous column order useful? Derekt75 23:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Here are the differences that I remember:
