Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tinning kit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Great ruminations! [[Special:Contributions/68.83.72.162|68.83.72.162]] 04:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | Great ruminations! [[Special:Contributions/68.83.72.162|68.83.72.162]] 04:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I agree! --[[User:Petzl|Petzl]] 21:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | :I agree! --[[User:Petzl|Petzl]] 21:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Homemade and rotten dichotomy? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Non-rotten tins are generated without the word "homemade" in the name; is there a valid reason for [[User:Ckbryant]]'s revert of my edit? If so, it isn't explained in the article, which is now, again, ambiguous. [[Special:Contributions/71.131.206.134|71.131.206.134]] | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 1 August 2008
Great ruminations! 68.83.72.162 04:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I agree! --Petzl 21:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Homemade and rotten dichotomy?
Non-rotten tins are generated without the word "homemade" in the name; is there a valid reason for User:Ckbryant's revert of my edit? If so, it isn't explained in the article, which is now, again, ambiguous. 71.131.206.134
