Talk:Tinning kit
Great ruminations! 68.83.72.162 04:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I agree! --Petzl 21:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Homemade and rotten dichotomy?
Non-rotten tins are generated without the word "homemade" in the name; is there a valid reason for User:Ckbryant's revert of my edit? If so, it isn't explained in the article, which is now, again, ambiguous. 71.131.206.134
Deletion of commentary
I was sad to see that an anonymous user had deleted a few lines I wrote in this article about tinning in our world, and what a remarkable object the Nethack tinning kit must be. Of course, it had nothing to do with gameplay, but it seems to me that lots of stuff in Nethack and in this wiki has nothing to do with gameplay. Do we really need to know the shapes of the various polearms? Or read most of those encyclopedia entries? I thought the section was interesting and enjoyable, and at least two users of the wiki enjoyed it enough to put appreciative comments on this discussion page. I have therefore undone the deletion. Perhaps it was my original section heading, "pointless ruminations," that set off that other editor. I have tried to give the section a less-offensive name.
I would be sad to see it removed from the article--I think it's just one of those fun things to reflect on as you play nethack.
Well, I'm back to exploring Gehennom and tinning all the nurses. Only damn advantage of playing a Caveman I've seen so far...--Ckbryant 16:54, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- I definitely enjoyed your text and will ban the next one who dares to remove it! —ZeroOne (talk / @) 22:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for all you do to keep the place running and orderly!--Ckbryant 18:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Contradiction
-Poisonous and acidic corpses are also rendered harmless.
-A blessed tin of acid blob always opens in one turn and can save you from stoning.
These two lines contradict one another. The acid would be required to end the stoning. Either the acid is removed and the tin does not save from stoning, or the tin saves from stoning but still applies acid damage. Which one?
- Actually both are correct. The acid is rendered harmless in the sense that it won't give you a “very bad case of stomach acid”, but it will still cure stoning. This occurs because (cprefx in eat.c) cures stoning and is called by the corpse-eating code and tin-eating code, whereas stomach acid is handled by (eatcorpse in eat.c) which is not invoked for tins. -- Killian 11:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
