Difference between revisions of "User:Tjr/todos"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/)
(refsrc)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
* http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/ Make clear this site is trustworthy.
 
* http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/ Make clear this site is trustworthy.
 +
* http://nethackwiki.com/wiki/Special:Captcha/help --> should provide the hint all questions deal with NetHack, and newbies can find the answers on this wiki.
  
(<nowiki>{{REVISIONID}}</nowiki>: {{REVISIONID}} )
+
* Understand why my combined ref / sourcecode template doesn't work.{{refsrc|Dogmove.c|675}}
(<nowiki>{{REVISIONID:Wish}}</nowiki>: {{REVISIONID:Wish}} )
 
(<nowiki>{{REVISIONID:Wikipedia:Wish}}</nowiki>: {{REVISIONID:Wikipedia:Wish}} )
 
(<nowiki>{{#REVISIONID}}</nowiki>: {{#REVISIONID}} )
 
(<nowiki>{{#REVISIONID:Wish}}</nowiki>: {{#REVISIONID:Wish}} )
 
(<nowiki>{{#REVISIONID:Wikipedia:Wish}}</nowiki>: {{#REVISIONID:Wikipedia:Wish}} )
 
  
<poll>
+
Are we really on hit #1 on Google for nethack+wiki? The webmaster tools claim we're #9 with a dismal click-through rate.
Which role do you think is easiest?
+
http://www.search-engine-optimization-tools-and-software.com/tools/serp-position/
wizard
+
 
valkyrie
+
<references/>
I don't care
 
I haven't played them all
 
</poll>
 

Latest revision as of 09:39, 1 February 2011

  • Understand why my combined ref / sourcecode template doesn't work.[1]

Are we really on hit #1 on Google for nethack+wiki? The webmaster tools claim we're #9 with a dismal click-through rate. http://www.search-engine-optimization-tools-and-software.com/tools/serp-position/