Difference between revisions of "User talk:Fjarlq"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Message from 195.2.224.193: reply)
(delete discussion about a long-since resolved issue)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Message from 195.2.224.193 ==
 
  
spam site. no https. --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193|195.2.244.193]] 13:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
 
* Person at 195.2.224.193: What are you talking about? What spam site? no https where? Why did you leave this message here? --[[User:Fjarlq|Fjarlq]] ([[User talk:Fjarlq|talk]]) 03:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 
** <nowiki>https://www.fjarlq.com/</nowiki> does not work for me.
 
** my work network warns me that <nowiki>http://www.fjarlq.com/</nowiki> is a gambling site and won't let me open it. linking to a gambling site would qualify as spam, surely? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193|195.2.244.193]] 12:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 
*** I have no idea what you're talking about. http://www.fjarlq.com/ is not a gambling site, it's my personal website ([http://i.imgur.com/kbqfNRm.png Screenshot]) that merely contains a few links to my profiles on other websites, none of which are gambling related. I am a former NetHack devteam member and I have no connection with gambling whatsoever. I think your work network must be either hacked or broken. --[[User:Fjarlq|Fjarlq]] ([[User talk:Fjarlq|talk]]) 22:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 
**** it's neither hacked nor broken. overly circumspect, perhaps. you've got yourself on a blacklist. sorry about that, it sucks. i can ask which one if you like but i doubt i'll get an answer. --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193|195.2.244.193]] 13:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 
***** Your work's blacklist sounds quite broken to me, given that it makes obviously ridiculous claims like "fjarlq.com is a gambling site". --[[User:Fjarlq|Fjarlq]] ([[User talk:Fjarlq|talk]]) 18:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 19:34, 7 April 2017