User talk:Gus Van

From NetHackWiki
Revision as of 16:01, 13 October 2018 by Luxidream (talk | contribs) (Wand of cancellation: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome!

Welcome!

Hi, Gus Van! Welcome, and thanks for joining NetHackWiki!

  • The How to help and Style guide pages are excellent starting points.
  • Special:Recentchanges is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
  • Questions? Need help? You can ask at the Community Portal, the forum, or on the discussion page associated with each article! Just remember to sign those posts with four tildes: ~~~~. That will expand to create a signature.

You can put {{NAOplayer|NAO player account}} on your user page to link to your NAO player account. Capitalization matters.

We are really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!

This is an automated greeting.

-- New user message (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Wand of cancellation

So I asked AmyBSOD on IRC about the properties of the wand of cancellation in SLASH'EM Extended:

"The wand is zapped by monsters in both slashem and slex, it cancels the player's stuff in both slashem and slex, and should also self-identify if you saw the wand being zapped... if you get "The goblin zaps a wintry wand! You are covered in sparkling lights!", the game should automatically identify that the wintry wand is a wand of cancellation.""

Thus, the behavior is consistent with that of SLASH'EM. The only difference is that the effect is fully resisted by magic resistance in SLASH'EM, but only 95% resisted in SLASH'EM Extended. Could you edit the variant information to reflect this?

Luxidream (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)