Difference between revisions of "User talk:New user message"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Hi, could you explain how talking about weapons as universal, broad, and narrow is "dubious" or "non factual garbage"? It's nothing more than an English verbalization of the...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It's nothing more than an English verbalization of the factual properties of artifact weapons. -magicbymccauley | It's nothing more than an English verbalization of the factual properties of artifact weapons. -magicbymccauley | ||
| + | |||
| + | But I've gotten down to 1381 words to the current article's 992. There is no more concise left to be had. | ||
| + | |||
| + | May I have 389 words to improve the article? | ||
| + | |||
| + | What is the word to zorkmid conversion rate? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is 992 the maximum number of words allowed for this article? | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://nethackwiki.com/wiki/User:Magicbymccauley/Better_artifact | ||
Revision as of 17:00, 29 August 2019
Hi, could you explain how talking about weapons as universal, broad, and narrow is "dubious" or "non factual garbage"?
It's nothing more than an English verbalization of the factual properties of artifact weapons. -magicbymccauley
But I've gotten down to 1381 words to the current article's 992. There is no more concise left to be had.
May I have 389 words to improve the article?
What is the word to zorkmid conversion rate?
Is 992 the maximum number of words allowed for this article?
https://nethackwiki.com/wiki/User:Magicbymccauley/Better_artifact
