Difference between revisions of "Forum:Is it possible to patch NetHack in binary form?"

Revision as of 07:15, 9 May 2013

So I downloaded NetHack 3.4.3's binary release for Windows. Is it possible to compile it in such a form? Occultus (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

"Is it possible to compile it in such a form?", no as compiling produces binary from source code. To compile patched version you need source code. See compiling page for more info. Bulwersator (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:57, 8 May 2013 (view source) Occultus (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:15, 9 May 2013 (view source) Bulwersator (talk \| contribs) (* "Is it possible to compile it in such a form?", no as compiling produces binary from source code. To compile patched version you need source code. See compiling page for more info. ~~~~) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	So I downloaded NetHack 3.4.3's binary release for Windows. Is it possible to compile it in such a form? [[User:Occultus\|Occultus]] ([[User talk:Occultus\|talk]]) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)		So I downloaded NetHack 3.4.3's binary release for Windows. Is it possible to compile it in such a form? [[User:Occultus\|Occultus]] ([[User talk:Occultus\|talk]]) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
		+	* "Is it possible to compile it in such a form?", no as compiling produces binary from source code. To compile patched version you need source code. See [[compiling]] page for more info. [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 07:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)