Difference between revisions of "Forum:Is it possible to patch NetHack in binary form?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bulwersator (talk | contribs) (* "Is it possible to compile it in such a form?", no as compiling produces binary from source code. To compile patched version you need source code. See compiling page for more info. ~~~~) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So I downloaded NetHack 3.4.3's binary release for Windows. Is it possible to compile it in such a form? [[User:Occultus|Occultus]] ([[User talk:Occultus|talk]]) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | So I downloaded NetHack 3.4.3's binary release for Windows. Is it possible to compile it in such a form? [[User:Occultus|Occultus]] ([[User talk:Occultus|talk]]) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | * "Is it possible to compile it in such a form?", no as compiling produces binary from source code. To compile patched version you need source code. See [[compiling]] page for more info. [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 07:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:15, 9 May 2013
So I downloaded NetHack 3.4.3's binary release for Windows. Is it possible to compile it in such a form? Occultus (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- "Is it possible to compile it in such a form?", no as compiling produces binary from source code. To compile patched version you need source code. See compiling page for more info. Bulwersator (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)