Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alignment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MadDawg2552 (talk | contribs) |
(Thanks for any corrections.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Ekaterin|Ekaterin]] 09:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | [[User:Ekaterin|Ekaterin]] 09:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I changed it a little bit to make it a little clearer, and also corrected the neutral thing. --[[User:MadDawg2552|MadDawg2552]] 01:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | :I changed it a little bit to make it a little clearer, and also corrected the neutral thing. --[[User:MadDawg2552|MadDawg2552]] 01:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Oops, I might have confused [[murder]] and [[stealing from shops]] when editing this [[alignment]] page. Various sources agree with Ekaterin that neutrals have no penalty for direct theft. Apparently neutrals have some penalty for murder. Thanks for any corrections, [[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 05:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:57, 21 January 2007
This page says that lawful and neutral characters need to avoid shoplifting. I see two problems with this statement. Firstly, I don't think the term "shoplifting" is defined anywhere on this wiki, and clearing out a shop with the aid of a pet carries no penalty for anyone. Secondly, AFAIR the penalty for direct theft (the kind that gets the Kops after you) is 1 point of alignment if you are lawful, and I do not believe that neutrals are penalised at all. Ekaterin 09:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I changed it a little bit to make it a little clearer, and also corrected the neutral thing. --MadDawg2552 01:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, I might have confused murder and stealing from shops when editing this alignment page. Various sources agree with Ekaterin that neutrals have no penalty for direct theft. Apparently neutrals have some penalty for murder. Thanks for any corrections, Kernigh 05:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
