Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amoeboid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Do amoeboids include (some) jellies too?: new section) |
Andrio Celos (talk | contribs) (→Do amoeboids include (some) jellies too?: Probably not.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Not all jellies are amoeboids, of course, such as the jellyfish. But are some jellies nonetheless included among amoeboids too? | Not all jellies are amoeboids, of course, such as the jellyfish. But are some jellies nonetheless included among amoeboids too? | ||
| + | |||
| + | : {{monsymlink|Jellyfish}} are part of the {{monclass|;}} class, not {{monclass|j}}. However, the article implies that the term refers to the monsters that leave [[glob]]s, which are those in the {{monclass|b}} or {{monclass|P}} class. The only mention in the source code is in the 'blob'/'ooze'/'pudding'/'[[Green slime|slime]]' [[encyclopedia]] entry, all of which are monsters that leave globs. Under this interpretation, jellies are excluded. - [[User:Andrio Celos|Andrio Celos]] ([[User talk:Andrio Celos|talk]]) 07:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:39, 3 July 2020
Do amoeboids include (some) jellies too?
The page for Ochre Jelly cites this monster as being an amoeboid: https://nethackwiki.com/wiki/Ochre_jelly
Not all jellies are amoeboids, of course, such as the jellyfish. But are some jellies nonetheless included among amoeboids too?
- ; Jellyfish are part of the ; sea monster class, not j jelly. However, the article implies that the term refers to the monsters that leave globs, which are those in the b blob or P pudding or ooze class. The only mention in the source code is in the 'blob'/'ooze'/'pudding'/'slime' encyclopedia entry, all of which are monsters that leave globs. Under this interpretation, jellies are excluded. - Andrio Celos (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
