Difference between revisions of "Talk:Book of the Dead"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Still needed after invocation?: new section) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: One of the spoilers also mentions Tibetian mythology. -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 13:05, September 24, 2009 (UTC) | :: One of the spoilers also mentions Tibetian mythology. -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 13:05, September 24, 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Still needed after invocation? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If Rodney should steal the book sometime after performing the invocation, does it matter? Is there any reason to continue carrying it around? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Davek|Davek]] ([[User talk:Davek|talk]]) 14:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 7 August 2014
Anyone knows the origin of the book? Newtkiller 20:16, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
- [1] maybe that book of the dead?Newtkiller 20:21, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
- One of the spoilers also mentions Tibetian mythology. -Tjr 13:05, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
Still needed after invocation?
If Rodney should steal the book sometime after performing the invocation, does it matter? Is there any reason to continue carrying it around?
