Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boulder"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply to Kernigh)
(modified my reply ;))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"''When faced with two consecutive boulders in a corridor —— you can squeeze past one to push the other.''" How exactly does one do this? Wouldn't you just squeeze past the second boulder too instead of pushing it, if you just squeezed past the first one? --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 16:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 
"''When faced with two consecutive boulders in a corridor —— you can squeeze past one to push the other.''" How exactly does one do this? Wouldn't you just squeeze past the second boulder too instead of pushing it, if you just squeezed past the first one? --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 16:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 
: If there was an available space behind the second boulder, then you would be able to push it. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 19:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 
: If there was an available space behind the second boulder, then you would be able to push it. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 19:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
::Unluckily you seldom know the corridors beforehand and come to know the existence of the second boulder only after the first one stops moving anymore... --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 19:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
+
::Ah, I see. You only squeeze by those boulders that are stuck — others will roll. --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 19:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:37, 21 July 2006

"When faced with two consecutive boulders in a corridor —— you can squeeze past one to push the other." How exactly does one do this? Wouldn't you just squeeze past the second boulder too instead of pushing it, if you just squeezed past the first one? --ZeroOne 16:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

If there was an available space behind the second boulder, then you would be able to push it. --Kernigh 19:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I see. You only squeeze by those boulders that are stuck — others will roll. --ZeroOne 19:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)