Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bugs in NetHack 4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→link anchors: new section) |
(→link anchors: yes, it's possible) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span name="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:51, 22 May 2012
Regarding bug C341-10, I believe worm teeth and crysknives don't stack because vanilla can't pluralize tooth correctly. That pretty much goes against the spirit of the projectile bonus you get for those items. --Tjr 20:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Nope, they do stack. Credits to Bcode. --Tjr 20:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, they (normally) don't stack, but if they could, the "tooth" would be pluralized correctly to "teeth"; I used gdb to modify the object quantity and create a stack of them. --Bcode 21:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The pacifist page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --Tjr 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
link anchors
Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: [[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]. --Tjr (talk) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes; if you replace
C343-21
with<span name="C343-21">C343-21</span>
(and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a Template:C to abstract this, so that you can just write{{C|343-21}}
instead. 95.149.230.215 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)