Difference between revisions of "Talk:Credit cloning"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MadDawg2552 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Would this be considered cheating? You are exploiting a shopkeeper's ignorance of your gold theft, giving you access to all of his gold. Exploitation could be defined as a form of cheating. --[[User:MadDawg2552|MadDawg2552]] 04:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | Would this be considered cheating? You are exploiting a shopkeeper's ignorance of your gold theft, giving you access to all of his gold. Exploitation could be defined as a form of cheating. --[[User:MadDawg2552|MadDawg2552]] 04:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Only as much as techniques such as Pet stealing is considered cheating. Pet stealing (have your pet steal items) is exploiting the shop keepers ignorance of your pet stealing things. I think its a player choice. [[User:Zaffle|Zaffle]] 04:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:27, 5 August 2007
>The technique is very time consuming and must not be done if you don't have enough food.
People who don't have enough food most of the time shouldn't deliberately exploit shopkeepers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N8chz (talk • contribs)
Would this be considered cheating? You are exploiting a shopkeeper's ignorance of your gold theft, giving you access to all of his gold. Exploitation could be defined as a form of cheating. --MadDawg2552 04:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Only as much as techniques such as Pet stealing is considered cheating. Pet stealing (have your pet steal items) is exploiting the shop keepers ignorance of your pet stealing things. I think its a player choice. Zaffle 04:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
