Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deferred features"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Imaginary Widget...: new section) |
Bulwersator (talk | contribs) (→"There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense.": new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? [[Special:Contributions/75.58.124.110|75.58.124.110]] 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC) | The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? [[Special:Contributions/75.58.124.110|75.58.124.110]] 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense." == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:56, 19 December 2012
Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.Ray Chason 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- True, but as far as I can tell, there are no other obsolete features still in the code (except a few internal functions). I mentioned them here in the same way I mentioned Disease on the Sickness page, as a not-to-be-confused-with section. --Jayt 09:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Imaginary Widget...
The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? 75.58.124.110 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
"There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense."
Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? Bulwersator (talk) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
