Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deferred features"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bulwersator (talk | contribs) (→"There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense.": new section) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It's compiled out with no comment explaining why. I don't know how the offense code works, so I can't tell if it'd work if the '''#if 0''' was removed or not. Code's at {{sourcecode|muse.c|1082}}, for reference. -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok|talk]]) 13:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:26, 19 December 2012
Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.Ray Chason 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- True, but as far as I can tell, there are no other obsolete features still in the code (except a few internal functions). I mentioned them here in the same way I mentioned Disease on the Sickness page, as a not-to-be-confused-with section. --Jayt 09:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Imaginary Widget...
The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? 75.58.124.110 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
"There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense."
Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? Bulwersator (talk) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's compiled out with no comment explaining why. I don't know how the offense code works, so I can't tell if it'd work if the #if 0 was removed or not. Code's at muse.c, line 1082, for reference. -- Qazmlpok (talk) 13:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
