Difference between revisions of "Talk:Izchak"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Derekstiles (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The question came up in #nethack about whether it was actually poor form to steal from Izchak, and the consensus was that as it's his code that makes shk theft possible, it's not actually poor form or rude or whatever. Shrug. Just putting that out there --[[User:Derekstiles|Derekstiles]] 01:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | The question came up in #nethack about whether it was actually poor form to steal from Izchak, and the consensus was that as it's his code that makes shk theft possible, it's not actually poor form or rude or whatever. Shrug. Just putting that out there --[[User:Derekstiles|Derekstiles]] 01:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Half of #nethack's population weren't even born in 1994, probably. And I wouldn't personally take their advice on what is and is not rude; I've been there. Not that RGRN is any better, but... --[[User:192.193.245.16|192.193.245.16]] 08:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:25, 17 December 2007
Is it necessary to detail every use of Izchak's name in Nethack? I think trivia such as official screenshots need not be documented. 69.11.189.85 23:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think that there is plenty of room in this wiki for trivia (if it is on topic). We can always add more sections or make more articles. Is that not so? --Kernigh 01:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
The question came up in #nethack about whether it was actually poor form to steal from Izchak, and the consensus was that as it's his code that makes shk theft possible, it's not actually poor form or rude or whatever. Shrug. Just putting that out there --Derekstiles 01:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Half of #nethack's population weren't even born in 1994, probably. And I wouldn't personally take their advice on what is and is not rude; I've been there. Not that RGRN is any better, but... --192.193.245.16 08:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
