Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of vanilla NetHack tiles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(suggest using un-ID names for item tiles) |
(→Item tile naming) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Item tile naming == | == Item tile naming == | ||
In the game, the tiles for spellbooks, wands, gems, potions, scrolls, rings, amulets, and certain tools/armor correspond to the unidentified names. For example, red gems have a tile and so do smoky potions. Currently they're listed here under the identified name, but there's no set graphical representation for those. I suggest we use the un-ID'd names for naming those tiles.--[[User:Cadex|Cadex]] 21:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | In the game, the tiles for spellbooks, wands, gems, potions, scrolls, rings, amulets, and certain tools/armor correspond to the unidentified names. For example, red gems have a tile and so do smoky potions. Currently they're listed here under the identified name, but there's no set graphical representation for those. I suggest we use the un-ID'd names for naming those tiles.--[[User:Cadex|Cadex]] 21:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Yes, this makes sense. --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 22:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:04, 29 July 2006
Item tile naming
In the game, the tiles for spellbooks, wands, gems, potions, scrolls, rings, amulets, and certain tools/armor correspond to the unidentified names. For example, red gems have a tile and so do smoky potions. Currently they're listed here under the identified name, but there's no set graphical representation for those. I suggest we use the un-ID'd names for naming those tiles.--Cadex 21:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, this makes sense. --Jayt 22:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
