Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monster (Slash'EM Extended)"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Well, "oops". Turns out 1.6MiB on a single page won't make MediaWiki happy.)
 
(Ideas on restructuring monsters: new section)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
Thank you! —[[User:bcode|bcode]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:bcode|talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:EmailUser/Bcode|mail]]</sup> 00:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 
Thank you! —[[User:bcode|bcode]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:bcode|talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:EmailUser/Bcode|mail]]</sup> 00:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Ideas on restructuring monsters ==
 +
 +
It looks like turning all the monsters into a single big wikitable didn't work too well. We'll need to pick another option in order to list all the monsters. I've thought of a few ideas listed here:
 +
 +
* Create a page for each symbol and put a wikitable on each of them
 +
* Create a page for every 5 levels of monster, and then a new page for all the level 50+ monsters and put a wikitable on each of them
 +
* Combine the ideas above, as well as any other numbers we want to sort by
 +
* Create an offsite database and javascript viewer
 +
* Create an offside downloadable csv or odf spreadsheet
 +
* Create an offsite csv and javascript viewer
 +
 +
--[[User:Bug sniper|Bug sniper]] ([[User talk:Bug sniper|talk]]) 04:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:06, 10 July 2017

Page size

<!-- 
NewPP limit report
Cached time: 20170708210703
Cache expiry: 604800
Dynamic content: false
CPU time usage: 56.440 seconds
Real time usage: 61.075 seconds
Preprocessor visited node count: 104435/1000000
Preprocessor generated node count: 281016/1000000
Post‐expand include size: 624570/2097152 bytes
Template argument size: 16276/2097152 bytes
Highest expansion depth: 4/40
Expensive parser function count: 0/100
-->

That's on accessing the cached, anonymous version of the page. Trying to access it (or any diffs) on my logged in session, the wiki returns an HTTP 500 after about 50 seconds.

As it is, a 1.6 MiB page like this seems to refuse to work in any sensible way. I think the better option would be to split the page into multiple smaller pages.

I've reverted the page to the last revision that seems to be reasonably workable. Feel free to access the previous revision (if you can) to split up the information if you wish to do so, although I'd strongly advise laying out your plans on this talk page first to avoid further friction like this incident.

Thank you! —bcode talk | mail 00:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Ideas on restructuring monsters

It looks like turning all the monsters into a single big wikitable didn't work too well. We'll need to pick another option in order to list all the monsters. I've thought of a few ideas listed here:

  • Create a page for each symbol and put a wikitable on each of them
  • Create a page for every 5 levels of monster, and then a new page for all the level 50+ monsters and put a wikitable on each of them
  • Combine the ideas above, as well as any other numbers we want to sort by
  • Create an offsite database and javascript viewer
  • Create an offside downloadable csv or odf spreadsheet
  • Create an offsite csv and javascript viewer

--Bug sniper (talk) 04:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)