Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monster frequency"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I've been using...) |
(frequency numbers are better than frequency names) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have been using: | I have been using: | ||
| − | {|class | + | {|class="prettytable" |
|- | |- | ||
! Name !! Frequency | ! Name !! Frequency | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|} | |} | ||
when filling in the monster templates, though this probably does not agree with the system others have been using and it should be standardised before we attempt to add anything in. -- [[User:SGrunt|SGrunt]] 01:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | when filling in the monster templates, though this probably does not agree with the system others have been using and it should be standardised before we attempt to add anything in. -- [[User:SGrunt|SGrunt]] 01:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I linked the monster template to this page so curious folk can see what frequency is all about. IMHO, the names add nothing, whereas the number is at least meaningful (frequency 5 really is 5 times more frequent than frequency 1). We don't, for example, use names for experience points granted ("not much", "some", "a bunch", "loads"). --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 15:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:25, 29 September 2006
I have been using:
| Name | Frequency |
|---|---|
| very rare | 1 |
| rare | 2 |
| uncommon | 3 |
| common | 4 |
| very common | 5 |
when filling in the monster templates, though this probably does not agree with the system others have been using and it should be standardised before we attempt to add anything in. -- SGrunt 01:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- I linked the monster template to this page so curious folk can see what frequency is all about. IMHO, the names add nothing, whereas the number is at least meaningful (frequency 5 really is 5 times more frequent than frequency 1). We don't, for example, use names for experience points granted ("not much", "some", "a bunch", "loads"). --Jayt 15:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
