Difference between revisions of "Talk:NetHack 1.4f source code"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Yes, redirect identical historical source files.) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, they should redirect. Among other things, this means if someone annotates parts of one version, we don't have to update the other(s). --[[User:Eidolos|Eidolos]] 05:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | :Yes, they should redirect. Among other things, this means if someone annotates parts of one version, we don't have to update the other(s). --[[User:Eidolos|Eidolos]] 05:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Just be sure to document this so that people won't get confused as to why a 1.4f file redirects to a 1.3d file. --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 10:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:56, 2 September 2006
About three dozen source files in 1.4f are the same as in 1.3d. Should those perhaps be redirects? -- Ray Chason 04:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, they should redirect. Among other things, this means if someone annotates parts of one version, we don't have to update the other(s). --Eidolos 05:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Just be sure to document this so that people won't get confused as to why a 1.4f file redirects to a 1.3d file. --ZeroOne 10:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)