Difference between revisions of "Talk:NetHack in other languages"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (great) |
m (→Localization Strategy) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: As a bystander: sounds great. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr|talk]]) 20:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC) | : As a bystander: sounds great. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr|talk]]) 20:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:21, 22 April 2013
Localization Strategy
Hey guys, a section on localization strategy might be nice, and might be useful to someone toying with the idea of translating NetHack into a new language. I know mine (NetzHack's) is different from Patric's (you insert an additional layer of abstraction for output string constants, if I read your code correctly), which I guess is probably different from Ray's, etc. How about if each of us writes a paragraph or two about our approach? — Netzhack (talk) 13:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
