Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nexthack"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Is this a joke?: I still think this is a joke, or perhaps a good troll. If it isn't, it's still an article of substandard quality that even seems mostly inaccurate.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
No it's Not, At Some Point Precomplied Code From Other platform's (Maybe Even Nethack Source Code) | No it's Not, At Some Point Precomplied Code From Other platform's (Maybe Even Nethack Source Code) | ||
Will Be Incorprated The Irony is Bittersweet. --[[User:Rancalred|Rancalred]] ([[User talk:Rancalred|talk]]) 22:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC) | Will Be Incorprated The Irony is Bittersweet. --[[User:Rancalred|Rancalred]] ([[User talk:Rancalred|talk]]) 22:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Er, I don't recall Scratch being able to do that. (Also, I don't see what irony you're referring to.) | ||
| + | :I'd also like to remind you that your capitalization, while perhaps somewhat tolerable in the talk namespace (if you can't express your thoughts in a better way), is inappropriate for the main namespace, including this article. —[[User:bcode|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode|talk]] | [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode|mail]]</sup> 22:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 16 February 2013
Is this a joke?
Sorry to ask, but is this article a joke? The linked-to game doesn't seem to be a NetHack variant at all. I doubt reimplementing NetHack in the given development environment is possible (that is, without a really, really great amount of work). —bcode talk | mail 21:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
No it's Not, At Some Point Precomplied Code From Other platform's (Maybe Even Nethack Source Code) Will Be Incorprated The Irony is Bittersweet. --Rancalred (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Er, I don't recall Scratch being able to do that. (Also, I don't see what irony you're referring to.)
- I'd also like to remind you that your capitalization, while perhaps somewhat tolerable in the talk namespace (if you can't express your thoughts in a better way), is inappropriate for the main namespace, including this article. —bcode talk | mail 22:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
