Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ring strategy"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Re: =oProtection from Shape Changers. Umm....werebane doesn't keep [[chameleon]]s from becoming L and summoning nasties!  This effect is *not* supercedable!
+
== Re: =oProtection from Shape Changers. ==
 +
 
 +
Umm....werebane doesn't keep [[chameleon]]s from becoming L and summoning nasties!  This effect is *not* supercedable!
  
 
Let's change the article, then. I probably did some grammar mistakes so go ahead fixing them. --[[User:Progo|Progo]] 11:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 
Let's change the article, then. I probably did some grammar mistakes so go ahead fixing them. --[[User:Progo|Progo]] 11:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
A potentially interesting remark about rings is that a worn cursed ring can be made uncursed by dipping it into holy water.
 +
(useful if your ring of conflict/regeneration/levitation ... was cursed by a spellcaster) --JC
 +
 +
== Merging into Ring article ==
 +
 +
Thoughts on merging this into [[Ring#Strategy]]? I don't see why this has to be its own separate page. It feels a bit out of the way. [[User:Infinigon|Infinigon]] ([[User talk:Infinigon|talk]]) 02:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I think it should be fully rewritten first. It's not very good as-is, and I don't agree with many of the subjective strategy points that it makes. --[[User:Luxidream|Luxidream]] ([[User talk:Luxidream|talk]]) 22:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:40, 15 January 2021

Re: =oProtection from Shape Changers.

Umm....werebane doesn't keep chameleons from becoming L and summoning nasties! This effect is *not* supercedable!

Let's change the article, then. I probably did some grammar mistakes so go ahead fixing them. --Progo 11:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

A potentially interesting remark about rings is that a worn cursed ring can be made uncursed by dipping it into holy water. (useful if your ring of conflict/regeneration/levitation ... was cursed by a spellcaster) --JC

Merging into Ring article

Thoughts on merging this into Ring#Strategy? I don't see why this has to be its own separate page. It feels a bit out of the way. Infinigon (talk) 02:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I think it should be fully rewritten first. It's not very good as-is, and I don't agree with many of the subjective strategy points that it makes. --Luxidream (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)