Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scroll of punishment"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I disagree with iron ball redirecting to scroll of punishment)
 
(problem: information duplication)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't think [[iron ball]] should redirect to [[scroll of punishment]]. Where would we put facts about iron balls (such as their weight)? In my opinion, [[scroll of punishment]] should just talk about the effects of reading the scroll (and other such scroll-of-punishment-related information), [[iron ball]] should describe methods to remove the punishment. Also, you can be punished (chained to an iron ball) in other ways, such as by praying repeatedly with an angry deity, so perhaps [[punishment]] also deserves its own article. Finally, the style guide (though I'm aware that it's still being thought out) says "Redirect acronyms like [[YAFM]] to pages like [[Yet Another Funny Message]]. However, [[identification]], [[scroll of identify]], and [[spellbook of identify]] can be three separate pages." [[User:Eidolos|Eidolos]] 21:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 
I don't think [[iron ball]] should redirect to [[scroll of punishment]]. Where would we put facts about iron balls (such as their weight)? In my opinion, [[scroll of punishment]] should just talk about the effects of reading the scroll (and other such scroll-of-punishment-related information), [[iron ball]] should describe methods to remove the punishment. Also, you can be punished (chained to an iron ball) in other ways, such as by praying repeatedly with an angry deity, so perhaps [[punishment]] also deserves its own article. Finally, the style guide (though I'm aware that it's still being thought out) says "Redirect acronyms like [[YAFM]] to pages like [[Yet Another Funny Message]]. However, [[identification]], [[scroll of identify]], and [[spellbook of identify]] can be three separate pages." [[User:Eidolos|Eidolos]] 21:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Well, my justification was that when one gets punished by the scroll, they will search the spoiler (this wiki) for a way to undo it and they'd start by looking at the "scroll of punishment" entry. Thus I thought it would be a bit silly to make them read another article, especially since the link "iron ball" doesn't really tell that in that page you can learn about removing the chain. You are free to revert my changes, but I wish the amount of duplicated information is kept to minimum. If both of these pages and then a page called [[punishment]] tell, how to remove the chain, well, you know it's hard to update many separate versions of what should essentially be the same text. --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 18:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:07, 13 August 2006

I don't think iron ball should redirect to scroll of punishment. Where would we put facts about iron balls (such as their weight)? In my opinion, scroll of punishment should just talk about the effects of reading the scroll (and other such scroll-of-punishment-related information), iron ball should describe methods to remove the punishment. Also, you can be punished (chained to an iron ball) in other ways, such as by praying repeatedly with an angry deity, so perhaps punishment also deserves its own article. Finally, the style guide (though I'm aware that it's still being thought out) says "Redirect acronyms like YAFM to pages like Yet Another Funny Message. However, identification, scroll of identify, and spellbook of identify can be three separate pages." Eidolos 21:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, my justification was that when one gets punished by the scroll, they will search the spoiler (this wiki) for a way to undo it and they'd start by looking at the "scroll of punishment" entry. Thus I thought it would be a bit silly to make them read another article, especially since the link "iron ball" doesn't really tell that in that page you can learn about removing the chain. You are free to revert my changes, but I wish the amount of duplicated information is kept to minimum. If both of these pages and then a page called punishment tell, how to remove the chain, well, you know it's hard to update many separate versions of what should essentially be the same text. --ZeroOne 18:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)