Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stealing from shops"
(→pet stealing) |
Shadyjames (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Agreed, and done. --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 19:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | :Agreed, and done. --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 19:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
:: The 200 rock steal should be considered a cheat, I doubt the creators intended it to be possible. --[[User:124.197.54.130|124.197.54.130]] 00:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | :: The 200 rock steal should be considered a cheat, I doubt the creators intended it to be possible. --[[User:124.197.54.130|124.197.54.130]] 00:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The "if the shopkeeper is adjacent, they will grab your pack" thing is incorrect, i was three squares away and they "Leaped" and grabbed my pack. Somebody should test whether theres any distance that will allow this tactic, or whether its a whole-shop coverage area. | ||
+ | [[User:Shadyjames|Shadyjames]] 02:26, October 1, 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Wands == | == Wands == |
Revision as of 02:26, 1 October 2009
How about monsters with a theft-attack? Nymphs, monkeys, leprechauns. Maybe we should create a disambiguation page? --ZeroOne 17:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, and done. --Jayt 19:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- The 200 rock steal should be considered a cheat, I doubt the creators intended it to be possible. --124.197.54.130 00:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
The "if the shopkeeper is adjacent, they will grab your pack" thing is incorrect, i was three squares away and they "Leaped" and grabbed my pack. Somebody should test whether theres any distance that will allow this tactic, or whether its a whole-shop coverage area. Shadyjames 02:26, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
Wands
I killed a shopkeeper with a lvl 1 player by getting him between me, an empty square, and a wall zapping him with a wand of fire do that it bounced. It took 3 hits 1 miss and 2 zaps to kill him.
pet stealing
Using your pet to steal from a shop is listed as both indirect and direct. What is the difference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.245.231 (talk • contribs) 12 March 2009
- Indirect is incorrect. The shop owner won't become angered like the other direct methods mentioned. I will edit the page. --SaintD 22:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)