Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial conduct"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Zen) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Zen == | == Zen == | ||
First zen rogue that I am avare of was "3.4.3 4331546 7 -5 49 161 161 0 20060806 20060802 1031 Rog Hum Mal Cha ix,ascended" at NAO. | First zen rogue that I am avare of was "3.4.3 4331546 7 -5 49 161 161 0 20060806 20060802 1031 Rog Hum Mal Cha ix,ascended" at NAO. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Who was the player? If possible, would you please linkify the article to point to a reference for this ascension? -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 15:32, September 18, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 18 September 2009
Toolless
If you want to get in to chests or large boxes, can #forcing the lock with a blunt weapon to attempt to destroy the container (and zapping a /oLocking if you fail) break this unofficial conduct? Would using the unused (deferred?) feature #tip to upend a bag of its contents also break it? -- Kalon 00:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Inventoryless
The inventoryless conduct sounds like an extremely difficult one. Has it ever been done? I think the article needs an example or two about this. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 23:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Zen
First zen rogue that I am avare of was "3.4.3 4331546 7 -5 49 161 161 0 20060806 20060802 1031 Rog Hum Mal Cha ix,ascended" at NAO.
- Who was the player? If possible, would you please linkify the article to point to a reference for this ascension? -Tjr 15:32, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
