Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial conduct"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Inventoryless: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The inventoryless conduct sounds like an extremely difficult one. Has it ever been done? I think the article needs an example or two about this. —[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne|talk]]</small> / <small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne|@]]</small>) 23:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | The inventoryless conduct sounds like an extremely difficult one. Has it ever been done? I think the article needs an example or two about this. —[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne|talk]]</small> / <small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne|@]]</small>) 23:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Zen == | ||
| + | First zen rogue that I am avare of was "3.4.3 4331546 7 -5 49 161 161 0 20060806 20060802 1031 Rog Hum Mal Cha ix,ascended" at NAO. | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 18 September 2009
Toolless
If you want to get in to chests or large boxes, can #forcing the lock with a blunt weapon to attempt to destroy the container (and zapping a /oLocking if you fail) break this unofficial conduct? Would using the unused (deferred?) feature #tip to upend a bag of its contents also break it? -- Kalon 00:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Inventoryless
The inventoryless conduct sounds like an extremely difficult one. Has it ever been done? I think the article needs an example or two about this. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 23:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Zen
First zen rogue that I am avare of was "3.4.3 4331546 7 -5 49 161 161 0 20060806 20060802 1031 Rog Hum Mal Cha ix,ascended" at NAO.
