Difference between revisions of "Forum:I propose polearm article for featured"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
The [[Polearm]] article looks really nice. I propose to upgrade it to featured. This stands even if it may be incomplete (it doesn't seem like it).--[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 16:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 
The [[Polearm]] article looks really nice. I propose to upgrade it to featured. This stands even if it may be incomplete (it doesn't seem like it).--[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 16:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:O well, i guess i'll just get bold and i'll upgrade it.--[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 08:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:O well, i guess i'll just get bold and i'll upgrade it.--[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 08:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 +
:AFAIK, a Featured Article is one that's been in the "Featured" box on the front page. It's not just a classification like "good article" on WP. [[User:Kufat|Kufat]] ([[User talk:Kufat|talk]]) 16:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:19, 25 December 2014


The Polearm article looks really nice. I propose to upgrade it to featured. This stands even if it may be incomplete (it doesn't seem like it).--Quantum Immortal (talk) 16:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

O well, i guess i'll just get bold and i'll upgrade it.--Quantum Immortal (talk) 08:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
AFAIK, a Featured Article is one that's been in the "Featured" box on the front page. It's not just a classification like "good article" on WP. Kufat (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)