Difference between revisions of "Forum:Socially positive ads"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(conclusion?)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
::What you think of this one? [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uK0_jwyh_0 buy nothing day] (the same as above). TV stations refused to air it at all, even when offered money. watch it please. Also this one [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4 awareness test] (do the test seriously, yes it's an advert too). They are different from normal adds, they don't sell a stupid product.--[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 12:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::What you think of this one? [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uK0_jwyh_0 buy nothing day] (the same as above). TV stations refused to air it at all, even when offered money. watch it please. Also this one [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4 awareness test] (do the test seriously, yes it's an advert too). They are different from normal adds, they don't sell a stupid product.--[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 12:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::I'm not talking about obnoxious adds like these [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk Balmer sells Windows 1] . I'm talking about things like these [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uK0_jwyh_0 buy nothing day]. I'm saying to put them for free of course... :D --[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 19:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::I'm not talking about obnoxious adds like these [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk Balmer sells Windows 1] . I'm talking about things like these [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uK0_jwyh_0 buy nothing day]. I'm saying to put them for free of course... :D --[[User:Quantum Immortal|Quantum Immortal]] ([[User talk:Quantum Immortal|talk]]) 19:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
#NetHackWiki is about NetHack
 +
#NetHack is for nerds
 +
#Nerds are annoyed by advertising
 +
#NetHackWiki does not want to annoy its users
 +
#:are any of these premises false? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193|195.2.244.193]] 12:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:49, 2 December 2014


A little proposal, why not have socially positive adverts. Some examples: buy nothing day (yea, missed it for 4 days :'() autism launch Maybe others with the red cross .... stuff like that... Maybe with a template for easy change? Maybe rotate randomly through a list? What you people think?--Quantum Immortal (talk) 11:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

It's probably best to have no adverts at all. That was one of the reasons for forking, after all (although not the main one). Ais523 (talk) 03:59, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
What you think of this one? buy nothing day (the same as above). TV stations refused to air it at all, even when offered money. watch it please. Also this one awareness test (do the test seriously, yes it's an advert too). They are different from normal adds, they don't sell a stupid product.--Quantum Immortal (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm not talking about obnoxious adds like these Balmer sells Windows 1 . I'm talking about things like these buy nothing day. I'm saying to put them for free of course... :D --Quantum Immortal (talk) 19:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  1. NetHackWiki is about NetHack
  2. NetHack is for nerds
  3. Nerds are annoyed by advertising
  4. NetHackWiki does not want to annoy its users
    are any of these premises false? --195.2.244.193 12:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)