Difference between revisions of "Forum:Why does copper corrode?"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Vladbane)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Does this mean acid in NetHack is oxidizing acid?{{wikipedia|oxidizing acid}}
 
Does this mean acid in NetHack is oxidizing acid?{{wikipedia|oxidizing acid}}
 
Bronze and brass will still corrode by acid, because they also contain tin(Sn) and zinc(Zn), respectively, which have higher reactivity than hydrogen. --[[User:NDos|NDos]] ([[User talk:NDos|talk]]) 22:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 
Bronze and brass will still corrode by acid, because they also contain tin(Sn) and zinc(Zn), respectively, which have higher reactivity than hydrogen. --[[User:NDos|NDos]] ([[User talk:NDos|talk]]) 22:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
: Because real copper just ''does'' corrode, no matter what the science seems to be saying. There's more complicated principles at work, I'm sure. [[User:JMarieStanton|JMarieStanton]] ([[User talk:JMarieStanton|talk]]) 12:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 
:It's probably because the copper item that's most likely to be corroded is the bronze plate mail which, as the name implies, is made of bronze. Just my thoughts, really. --[[User:Kahran042|Kahran042]] ([[User talk:Kahran042|talk]]) 01:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 
:It's probably because the copper item that's most likely to be corroded is the bronze plate mail which, as the name implies, is made of bronze. Just my thoughts, really. --[[User:Kahran042|Kahran042]] ([[User talk:Kahran042|talk]]) 01:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::But by that logic, a copper ring should not corrode, as it is a pure copper. --[[User:NDos|NDos]] ([[User talk:NDos|talk]]) 01:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::But by that logic, a copper ring should not corrode, as it is a pure copper. --[[User:NDos|NDos]] ([[User talk:NDos|talk]]) 01:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 
:::3.6.1 will [https://sourceforge.net/p/nethack/NetHack/ci/ef863f3c9f6988d9efbda755dad26bf8b3f24f29/ restrict erosion to weapons, armor, some tools and the ball-and-chain], so the point will be moot come next version. --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] ([[User talk:Darth l33t|talk]]) 14:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 
:::3.6.1 will [https://sourceforge.net/p/nethack/NetHack/ci/ef863f3c9f6988d9efbda755dad26bf8b3f24f29/ restrict erosion to weapons, armor, some tools and the ball-and-chain], so the point will be moot come next version. --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] ([[User talk:Darth l33t|talk]]) 14:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
::::Does this mean it's no longer possible to kill [[Vlad]] with a rusty tin opener!? Awwww... :-(  :-(  --[[User:Luna|Luna]] ([[User talk:Luna|talk]]) 02:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:18, 4 January 2018


Since copper(Cu) has lower reactivity than hydrogen(H), copper should not corrode by acid.

Does this mean acid in NetHack is oxidizing acid?

Bronze and brass will still corrode by acid, because they also contain tin(Sn) and zinc(Zn), respectively, which have higher reactivity than hydrogen. --NDos (talk) 22:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Because real copper just does corrode, no matter what the science seems to be saying. There's more complicated principles at work, I'm sure. JMarieStanton (talk) 12:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
It's probably because the copper item that's most likely to be corroded is the bronze plate mail which, as the name implies, is made of bronze. Just my thoughts, really. --Kahran042 (talk) 01:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
But by that logic, a copper ring should not corrode, as it is a pure copper. --NDos (talk) 01:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
3.6.1 will restrict erosion to weapons, armor, some tools and the ball-and-chain, so the point will be moot come next version. --Darth l33t (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Does this mean it's no longer possible to kill Vlad with a rusty tin opener!? Awwww... :-( :-( --Luna (talk) 02:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)