Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amulet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Eating strangulation: new section) |
m (Eating "oStrangulation has *some* use...) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Should an amulet of strangulation really be listed with the "EAT" property? According to its page, this causes you to immediately choke to death. [[Special:Contributions/69.20.237.100|69.20.237.100]] 20:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | Should an amulet of strangulation really be listed with the "EAT" property? According to its page, this causes you to immediately choke to death. [[Special:Contributions/69.20.237.100|69.20.237.100]] 20:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | * Well, it is able to be eaten, so yes. Additionally, it does have *some* use - if you are a metallivore and are starving to death, you can munch on it and take you 1/5 chance of strangling but end up with 4/5 chance of gaining nutrition... -- [[User:Kalon|Kalon]] 22:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:47, 17 December 2008
Amulets don't increase hunger like Rings do? If not, please add a sentece to the article =)
Eating strangulation
Should an amulet of strangulation really be listed with the "EAT" property? According to its page, this causes you to immediately choke to death. 69.20.237.100 20:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it is able to be eaten, so yes. Additionally, it does have *some* use - if you are a metallivore and are starving to death, you can munch on it and take you 1/5 chance of strangling but end up with 4/5 chance of gaining nutrition... -- Kalon 22:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
