Difference between revisions of "Talk:Brown pudding"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "This article says that you can protect yourself from the brown pudding's rotting attack by wearing a cloak. It should mention that the attack can also rot your cloak. (As writ...") |
(→Re: Encyclopedia entry: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article says that you can protect yourself from the brown pudding's rotting attack by wearing a cloak. It should mention that the attack can also rot your cloak. (As written it seems to imply that it can only rot body armor.) | This article says that you can protect yourself from the brown pudding's rotting attack by wearing a cloak. It should mention that the attack can also rot your cloak. (As written it seems to imply that it can only rot body armor.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Re: Encyclopedia entry == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Checking my current version (i.e. 3.6.2 mobile) indicates that it shares an encyclopedia entry with the other [[blob]]s, puddings, and [[ooze]]s, and this is the only page that uses this quote in any context - nothing else comes up in a search for "The Magic Pudding", not even on the spoiler pages. Should I just go ahead and remove this? --[[User:Umbire the Phantom|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom|talk]]) 12:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 17 February 2020
This article says that you can protect yourself from the brown pudding's rotting attack by wearing a cloak. It should mention that the attack can also rot your cloak. (As written it seems to imply that it can only rot body armor.)
Re: Encyclopedia entry
Checking my current version (i.e. 3.6.2 mobile) indicates that it shares an encyclopedia entry with the other blobs, puddings, and oozes, and this is the only page that uses this quote in any context - nothing else comes up in a search for "The Magic Pudding", not even on the spoiler pages. Should I just go ahead and remove this? --Umbire the Phantom (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
