Difference between revisions of "Talk:Next version"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Dead?) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Dead?== | ==Dead?== | ||
Are there any clues developement is still in progress? Dead people or projects don't usually announce their demise, so we could be waiting forever. [[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 00:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | Are there any clues developement is still in progress? Dead people or projects don't usually announce their demise, so we could be waiting forever. [[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 00:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :The [http://nethack.org/v343/bugs.html bug list] is updated about once a month, so there's at least some work being done. | ||
Revision as of 07:34, 6 March 2009
Shouldn't this article be next version instead of NetHack 3.5.0? -paxed
- True. Done. --ZeroOne 11:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Savefile compatibility
What's the source for the sentence "it will not be savefile compatible"? --ZeroOne 07:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's just an observation that incrementing the minor number (3.X++) has always broken savefile compatibility; indeed, this can be one of the criteria for determining whether a new release is a minor update (3.X++) or a bugfix update (3.X.Y++). --Eidolos 07:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, well, since it isn't certain that the next version is 3.5.0, then I think this sentence should be removed or at least marked somehow. --ZeroOne 09:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Net Hackem Forever?
Also known as Net Hackem Forever? Hardly, I don't think I've heard that one anywhere else. --Paxed 00:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Dead?
Are there any clues developement is still in progress? Dead people or projects don't usually announce their demise, so we could be waiting forever. Tjr 00:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- The bug list is updated about once a month, so there's at least some work being done.
